On Monday 20 January 2014 17:57:27 Martin Jansa wrote: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 04:49:29PM +0000, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 20 January 2014 16:40, Koen Kooi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This builds the kernel portion of the kdbus implementation. Userspace > > > support needs systemd git and/or a special glib-2.0 branch.> > > As awesome as kdbus could be it's very much fresh code, can this live > > outside of oe-core for now? > > FWIW: it will be welcome with new systemd version in > meta-openembedded/meta-systemd > > Only disadvantage of it will be that current DEFAULT_PREFERENCE behavior > doesn't allow to demote this "experimental" version. So people using > meta-systemd will always get this one unless they set PREFERRED_VERSION > to version in oe-core. > > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2964
Surely then the better answer would be to use a different layer, rather than mixing all three of "legacy" RPROVIDES/RREPLACES/RCONFLICTS, additional systemd support not yet integrated into OE-Core (WIP) and the bleeding edge components we're now discussing? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
