On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Diego Sueiro <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Diego Sueiro <[email protected]> > wrote: >>> >>> then package the needed static library in -dev package. Now its not >>> recommended practice however sometimes >>> exceptions are made but I would recommend to check first if its an >>> oversight/bug in QT5 to not generate a .so >>> for the given library or it could be a architectural need to have it >>> static either way some clarification is needed >>> before this change is made >> >> >> Khem, >> >> Looking at some references it seems that qt just builds the static >> library: >> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/37447 >> >> http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/epel/6/x86_64/qt5-qttools-static-5.2.0-1.el6.x86_64.html >> >> http://fr2.rpmfind.net//linux/RPM/opensuse/factory/armv7hl/armv7hl/libqt4-devel-4.8.5-10.1.armv7hl.html > > > Any conclusions? >
Well. Do the needed in packaging it accordingly then _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
