On Monday, February 24, 2014 07:33:03 AM Diego Sueiro wrote: > Khem, > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Diego Sueiro <[email protected]>wrote: > > > I think is a choice. > > This is what the header says: > > > > > > /**************************************************************************** > > ** > > ** Copyright (C) 2013 Digia Plc and/or its subsidiary(-ies). > > ** Contact: http://www.qt-project.org/legal > > ** > > ** This file is part of the Qt Designer of the Qt Toolkit. > > ** > > ** $QT_BEGIN_LICENSE:LGPL$ > > ** Commercial License Usage > > ** Licensees holding valid commercial Qt licenses may use this file in > > ** accordance with the commercial license agreement provided with the > > ** Software or, alternatively, in accordance with the terms contained in > > ** a written agreement between you and Digia. For licensing terms and > > ** conditions see http://qt.digia.com/licensing. For further information > > ** use the contact form at http://qt.digia.com/contact-us. > > ** > > ** GNU Lesser General Public License Usage > > ** Alternatively, this file may be used under the terms of the GNU Lesser > > ** General Public License version 2.1 as published by the Free Software > > ** Foundation and appearing in the file LICENSE.LGPL included in the > > ** packaging of this file. Please review the following information to > > ** ensure the GNU Lesser General Public License version 2.1 requirements > > ** will be met: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.html. > > ** > > ** In addition, as a special exception, Digia gives you certain additional > > ** rights. These rights are described in the Digia Qt LGPL Exception > > ** version 1.1, included in the file LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt in this package. > > ** > > ** GNU General Public License Usage > > ** Alternatively, this file may be used under the terms of the GNU > > ** General Public License version 3.0 as published by the Free Software > > ** Foundation and appearing in the file LICENSE.GPL included in the > > ** packaging of this file. Please review the following information to > > ** ensure the GNU General Public License version 3.0 requirements will be > > ** met: http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html. > > ** > > ** > > ** $QT_END_LICENSE$ > > > > What is the verdict? Should I have to add any notes on commit message? >
Document the licensing in the commit, intent is to make it noticeable by and the consumers of QT SDK so they are aware of compliance.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
