On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 04:40 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2014-02-26 04:35, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > > > > Building powerpc machines with the standard security flags generated > > numerous > > build failures. Use a reduced set of flags for now to avoid linker issues > > and other compile failures. > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]> > > --- > > diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc > > b/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc > > index e7d4933a..b5489d8 100644 > > --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc > > +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc > > @@ -2,6 +2,14 @@ SECURITY_CFLAGS ?= "-fstack-protector-all -pie -fpie > > -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2" > > SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS ?= "-fstack-protector-all -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2" > > SECURITY_LDFLAGS ?= "-Wl,-z,relro,-z,now" > > > > +# powerpc does not get on with pie for reasons not looked into as yet > > +SECURITY_CFLAGS_powerpc = "-fstack-protector-all -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2" > > +# Deal with ppc specific linker failures when using the cflags > > +SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-dbus_powerpc = "" > > +SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-dbus-ptest_powerpc = "" > > +SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-libmatchbox_powerpc = "" > > +SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-webkit-gtk = "" > > The change for webkit doesn't seem to be PowerPC specific? If it needs > to be here, shouldn't it be in a separate change, or at least documented > in the change log?
Sorry, I'll make that powerpc specific, it was meant to be... Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
