Paul, On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Paul Eggleton < [email protected]> wrote:
> I know there's already been a bit of discussion about this patch already, > so I > apologise if this has already been covered, but the commit message doesn't > completely justify this addition. Most people don't statically link to Qt, > which is why we haven't included any static libraries in the SDK (and as a > rule we typically don't include any static libraries in our SDKs). Why is > this > individual library out of all of the libraries that Qt ships special? > I did a research on internet and just found static library for uitools. I could not found anything that explains the reasons for not generating a shared library. People will not be able to use uitools If this library is not shipped with SDK. I tried to explain this dependency on commit message: > libQtUiTools.a and libQtUiToolsE.a needs to be installed on > meta-toolchain-qt > and meta-toolchain-qte respectively. > Whitout this static library, compiling qt apps which needs uitools will > fail. Regards, -- *dS Diego Sueiro Administrador do Embarcados www.embarcados.com.br<http://www.embarcados.com.br/?utm_source=assinatura_diego&utm_medium=e-mail&utm_campaign=Assinatura%20Email%20Diego> /*long live rock 'n roll*/
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
