Hi David, On Wednesday 05 March 2014 13:34:41 David Nyström wrote: > On 2014-03-05 12:25, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > Turns out we're using the same old version of gnutls in master as in > > dylan and dora, and we need a fix for a compile failure. > > > > The following changes since commit 82c773e88aaefd9321481ad297554d5b4a3ae0b2: > > Revert "ncurses: use ln -r to generate relative symlink" (2014-03-03 > > 15:52:26 +0000)> > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib paule/gnutls > > http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h= > > paule/gnutls> > > Karl Hiramoto (2): > > gnutls: CVE-2014-0092 correct return codes > > gnutls: Fixed bug that prevented the rejection of v1 intermediate CA > > > > certificates. > > > > Paul Eggleton (1): > > gnutls: fix failure during do_compile > > Any specific reasons why we still have the old gnuTLS-2.12.23 ?
I'm not sure - there's no NO_UPGRADE_REASON set in our inc files to suggest why. Googling turned this up: https://wiki.debian.org/gnutls3 Valentin, Saul - we probably ought to have NO_UPGRADE_REASON set for gnutls if we have a good reason for staying with 2.12.x. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
