Hello, I am following up with this patch. If there are no other objects, can we please merge it ?
Thanks, Alex On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Damian, Alexandru < [email protected]> wrote: > Yep, tasks that were looked up, and actual filenames attempted. > > Alex > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Richard Purdie < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 15:41 +0000, Damian, Alexandru wrote: >> > I would think against it, because >> >> > - it's very inefficient to send a Skipped event for each missed task >> > than to collect all the data and send it in one shot >> > - it's faster to send the event from the sstate.bbclass than to return >> > the task ids and then call again a python function to generate the >> > sstate file names - basically replicating the sstate.bbclass code in >> > bitbake >> > - the queueTaskSkipped event has a different semantic than what we >> > need here to return a whole batch of data; creating a new event type >> > from scratch is a bit pointless since the inheritance would need to be >> > broken >> > - knotty can receive MetadataEvents just as well as sceneTaskSkipped >> > event, or any variation of it >> >> I guess I'd like to understand which information from this even you're >> particularly interested in? >> >> Do I understand correctly that you want the actual filenames attempted? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Richard >> >> >> > > > -- > Alex Damian > Yocto Project > SSG / OTC > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > >
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
