On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 08:52:15AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 14-03-28 05:45 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 14:25 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >> The release kernel for Yocto 1.5 is the 3.14 kernel, so we introduce > >> the versioned recipes here. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <[email protected]> > >> --- > >> meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-tiny_3.14.bb | 21 ++++++++++++ > >> meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.14.bb | 37 > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+) > >> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-tiny_3.14.bb > >> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.14.bb > >> > >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-tiny_3.14.bb > >> b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-tiny_3.14.bb > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 000000000000..8faa9584acf0 > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-tiny_3.14.bb > >> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ > >> +require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc > >> + > >> +KBRANCH = "standard/tiny/base" > >> +LINUX_KERNEL_TYPE = "tiny" > >> +KCONFIG_MODE = "--allnoconfig" > >> + > >> +LINUX_VERSION ?= "3.14-rc8" > >> + > >> +KMETA = "meta" > >> + > >> +SRCREV_machine ?= "fecc3fd7d31bd93766ff4f0431fecdbbfa4c3a7c" > >> +SRCREV_meta ?= "3689f99f4d2a051e8d3ff72345a67d4d04a88020" > >> + > >> +PV = "${LINUX_VERSION}+git${SRCPV}" > > > > I'm afraid we can't do this in such a simple way. The big issue is that > > according to our version comparison functions (in bitbake and in the > > package managers), "3.14-rc8" > "3.14". This will then break updates > > from package feeds. > > > > The traditional way we've worked around this in times gone by is the > > rather ugly: > > > > PV = "3.13+3.14-rc8+git${SRCPV}" > > > > since in this case "3.14" > "3.13+3.14-rc8" > > > > The better way to handle this would be "3.14~rc8" however not all of our > > package backends have support for "~" at this point so we can't do that. > > There is a long standing bug open about this. > > > > The same issue also applies to the libc-headers recipe. > > eeee. Since I don't do package feeds, it's never been a problem for me. > > Wouldn't PE bump when I go to 3.14 work as well ?
yes, but we were trying to use PE bumps only in cases where it's really needed, using sortable PV as RP suggested is IMHO better > Or does that go away with the PR sever as well ? no, sewer wont help > I can muck with PV, or we can hold until Linus releases over the > weekend, and I go with the released PVs. > > What's your preference ? > > Bruce > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Richard > > > > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
