On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 13:01 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 4/1/14, 12:51 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 18:48 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > >> Also note that the default for USE_DEVFS was (and is) 1, so the lack > >> of this check is actually causing a difference in the default > >> behaviour. If there's no appetite for reinstating the USE_DEVFS > >> mechanism per se then it seems like it would be a good idea to make > >> the default IMAGE_DEVICE_TABLE be blank in order to restore the > >> previous default of no /dev in the rootfs. > >> > >> At present you get a somewhat arbitrary-seeming smattering of devices > >> from meta/files/device_table-minimal.txt, including such anachronisms > >> as /dev/ttySA0 and /dev/apm_bios. It's hard to imagine that anybody > >> actually wants this stuff in their rootfs in this day and age. > > > > Can we kill apmd at the same time? Please? :) > > Isn't this still used on some ARM and MIPS targets? (they emulate apm for > basic > power management.)
Its not gone as far as I know but whether we need the userspace portion, I'm not so sure, it just does suspend/resume event notifuication afaik these days and I doubt much uses that now. The battery interfaces were long since replaced with proper sysfs ones. Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
