On 2014?04?02? 06:33, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Richard Purdie
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 17:09 +0800, Kai Kang wrote:
From: Li Wang <[email protected]>
ptest output format is incorrect, according to yocto Development Manual
(http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/dev-manual/dev-manual.html#testing-packages-with-ptest)
The test generates output in the format used by Automake:
<result>: <testname>
where the result can be PASS, FAIL, or SKIP, and the testname can be any
identifying string.
So we should change the test result format to match yocto ptest rules.
Signed-off-by: Li Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kai Kang <[email protected]>
---
meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake.inc | 1 +
.../cmake/cmake/follow_ptest_output_format.patch | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 119 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake/follow_ptest_output_format.patch
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake.inc
b/meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake.inc
index 1d5303f..254af45 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake.inc
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ SRC_URI =
"http://www.cmake.org/files/v${CMAKE_MAJOR_VERSION}/cmake-${PV}.tar.gz
file://aarch64-kwsys.patch \
file://qt4-fail-silent.patch \
file://cmake-2.8.11.2-FindFreetype.patch \
+ file://follow_ptest_output_format.patch \
"
inherit autotools-brokensep
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake/follow_ptest_output_format.patch
b/meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake/follow_ptest_output_format.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5428df2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake/follow_ptest_output_format.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+cmake: follow ptest output format
+
+ptest output format is incorrect, according to yocto Development Manual
+(http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/dev-manual/dev-manual.html#testing-packages-with-ptest)
+5.10.6. Testing Packages With ptest
+The test generates output in the format used by Automake:
+<result>: <testname>
+where the result can be PASS, FAIL, or SKIP, and the testname can be any
identifying string.
+So we should change the test result format to match yocto ptest rules.
+
+Signed-off-by: Li Wang <[email protected]>
No upstream status. Is there any chance of this going upstream? Might we
be better off postprocessing the output with a script to put it into the
right format?
I agree with both remarks. It'd be good to try to get it somehow
integrated upstream and for OE-Core interim solution would be better
to 'convert' using an external script. This may break external tests
tools people may be using as it changes the format without allowing to
'revert' for normal format.
OK. I'll send it upstream and see what's going on.
--
Regards,
Neil | Kai Kang
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
