Hello, On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Robert Yang <liezhi.y...@windriver.com> wrote: > On 04/07/2014 10:55 PM, Valentin Popa wrote: >> Indeed the build failure was introduced by that patch, which enters a >> logical >> conflict with the bbappend file for mesa. >> To remain compatible with the future releases I suggest to not remove/add >> flags >> from/to EXTRA_OECONF explicitly, and make use of what PACKAGECONFIG >> contains. >> The first part of the __anonymous function from the bbappend file can be >> simply >> replaced with: >> >> PACKAGECONFIG_remove = "egl" >> >> and the second part with: >> >> PROVIDES_remove = "virtual/libgles1 virtual/libgles2 virtual/egl" >> and >> PROVIDES_remove = "virtual/libgl" if mx6 is in SOC_FAMILY. >> > > Hi Otavio, > > Does Valentin's suggestions work for you, please?
I am traveling and won't be able to test it. However I am quite surprise this didn't come out /before/ when the dora updates were in test in AB since meta-fsl-arm is tested in AB too. We need to figure /why/ this broke and for now I think we ought to revert this dora patch. This kind of change needs to be coordinated and raise a build break in an Yocto Project is unacceptable IMO. For me it is clear this didn't run in AB before merging. :( -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
