On 05/22/2014 09:42 AM, Douglas Royds wrote:
On 19/05/14 19:00, [email protected] wrote:
From: Yue Tao <[email protected]>

Race condition in the ssl3_read_bytes function in s3_pkt.c in OpenSSL
through 1.0.1g, when SSL_MODE_RELEASE_BUFFERS is enabled, allows remote
attackers to inject data across sessions or cause a denial of service
(use-after-free and parsing error) via an SSL connection in a
multithreaded environment.

http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2010-5298

Signed-off-by: Yue Tao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Roy Li <[email protected]>
---
  .../openssl-1.0.1e/openssl-CVE-2010-5298.patch     |   24
++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644
meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl-1.0.1e/openssl-CVE-2010-5298.patch


diff --git
a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl-1.0.1e/openssl-CVE-2010-5298.patch
b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl-1.0.1e/openssl-CVE-2010-5298.patch

new file mode 100644
index 0000000..417a774
--- /dev/null
+++
b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl-1.0.1e/openssl-CVE-2010-5298.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+openssl fix for CVE-2010-5298
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport
+
+Race condition in the ssl3_read_bytes function in s3_pkt.c in OpenSSL
+through 1.0.1g, when SSL_MODE_RELEASE_BUFFERS is enabled, allows remote
+attackers to inject data across sessions or cause a denial of service
+(use-after-free and parsing error) via an SSL connection in a
+multithreaded environment.
+
+http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2010-5298
+
+Signed-off-by: Yue Tao <[email protected]>
+--- a/ssl/s3_pkt.c
++++ b/ssl/s3_pkt.c
+@@ -1013,7 +1013,7 @@ start:
+                 {
+                 s->rstate=SSL_ST_READ_HEADER;
+                 rr->off=0;
+-                if (s->mode & SSL_MODE_RELEASE_BUFFERS)
++                if (s->mode & SSL_MODE_RELEASE_BUFFERS &&
s->s3->rbuf.left == 0)
+                     ssl3_release_read_buffer(s);
+                 }
+             }

This patch file appears to be orphaned in openssl-1.0.1e/, when the
current version is 1.0.1g.

Also, there is no file://openssl-CVE-2010-5298.patch entry in the SRC_URI.

Was this deliberate? Am I missing something?


thank, I will fix it

-Roy
--
Best Reagrds,
Roy | RongQing Li
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to