On 06/16/2014 06:56 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
FYI: this will probably break
meta-initramfs/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools-klibc_2.0.2.bb

because it doesn't have kexec-tools directory in FILESPATH

WARNING: Unable to get checksum for kexec-tools-klibc SRC_URI entry
kexec-tools-Refine-kdump-device_tree-sort.patch: file could not be found
OK, I will send a new patch to fix this issue.

Best Regards
Chong

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:32:18AM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
Module: openembedded-core.git
Branch: master
Commit: c8722b510f779cd20757477a7f7a7a2a35b9a9c5
URL:    
http://git.openembedded.org/?p=openembedded-core.git&a=commit;h=c8722b510f779cd20757477a7f7a7a2a35b9a9c5

Author: Chong Lu <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue Jun 10 18:13:39 2014 +0800

kexec-tools: Refine kdump device_tree sort

The commit b02d735bf was to rearrange the device-tree entries, and
assumed that these entries are sorted in the ascending order. but
acctually when I was validating kexec and kdump, the order of
serial node still is changed. So the patch is to sort these entries
by the directory name in ascending order.

Signed-off-by: Yang Wei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chong Lu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]>

---

  meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools.inc          |  3 +-
  ...kexec-tools-Refine-kdump-device_tree-sort.patch | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools.inc 
b/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools.inc
index 50b448c..6a690c6 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools.inc
@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = 
"file://COPYING;md5=ea5bed2f60d357618ca161ad539f7c0a \
                      
file://kexec/kexec.c;beginline=1;endline=20;md5=af10f6ae4a8715965e648aa687ad3e09"
  DEPENDS = "zlib xz"
-SRC_URI = "${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/linux/utils/kernel/kexec/kexec-tools-${PV}.tar.gz"
+SRC_URI = 
"${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/linux/utils/kernel/kexec/kexec-tools-${PV}.tar.gz \
+           file://kexec-tools-Refine-kdump-device_tree-sort.patch"
inherit autotools-brokensep diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools/kexec-tools-Refine-kdump-device_tree-sort.patch b/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools/kexec-tools-Refine-kdump-device_tree-sort.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ab1fe96
--- /dev/null
+++ 
b/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools/kexec-tools-Refine-kdump-device_tree-sort.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+kexec-tools: Refine kdump device_tree sort
+
+The commit b02d735bf was to rearrange the device-tree entries, and
+assumed that these entries are sorted in the ascending order. but
+acctually when I was validating kexec and kdump, the order of
+serial node still is changed. So the patch is to sort these entries
+by the directory name in ascending order.
+
+Upstream-Status: Pending
+
+Signed-off-by: Yang Wei <[email protected]>
+Signed-off-by: Chong Lu <[email protected]>
+---
+ kexec/arch/ppc/fs2dt.c |   13 ++++++++++---
+ kexec/fs2dt.c          |   13 ++++++++++---
+ 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/kexec/arch/ppc/fs2dt.c b/kexec/arch/ppc/fs2dt.c
+index 4121c7d..cc04b04 100644
+--- a/kexec/arch/ppc/fs2dt.c
++++ b/kexec/arch/ppc/fs2dt.c
+@@ -296,6 +296,9 @@ static int comparefunc(const void *dentry1, const void 
*dentry2)
+ {
+       char *str1 = (*(struct dirent **)dentry1)->d_name;
+       char *str2 = (*(struct dirent **)dentry2)->d_name;
++      char* ptr1 = strchr(str1, '@');
++      char* ptr2 = strchr(str2, '@');
++      int len1, len2;
+
+       /*
+        * strcmp scans from left to right and fails to idetify for some
+@@ -303,9 +306,13 @@ static int comparefunc(const void *dentry1, const void 
*dentry2)
+        * Therefore, we get the wrong sorted order like memory@10000000 and
+        * memory@f000000.
+        */
+-      if (strchr(str1, '@') && strchr(str2, '@') &&
+-              (strlen(str1) > strlen(str2)))
+-              return 1;
++      if (ptr1 && ptr2) {
++              len1 = ptr1 - str1;
++              len2 = ptr2 - str2;
++              if (!strncmp(str1, str2, len1 >len2 ? len1: len2) &&
++                                      (strlen(str1) > strlen(str2)))
++                              return 1;
++      }
+
+       return strcmp(str1, str2);
+ }
+diff --git a/kexec/fs2dt.c b/kexec/fs2dt.c
+index 5e6b98d..1c0345b 100644
+--- a/kexec/fs2dt.c
++++ b/kexec/fs2dt.c
+@@ -475,6 +475,9 @@ static int comparefunc(const struct dirent **dentry1,
+ {
+       char *str1 = (*(struct dirent **)dentry1)->d_name;
+       char *str2 = (*(struct dirent **)dentry2)->d_name;
++      char* ptr1 = strchr(str1, '@');
++      char* ptr2 = strchr(str2, '@');
++      int len1, len2;
+
+       /*
+        * strcmp scans from left to right and fails to idetify for some
+@@ -482,9 +485,13 @@ static int comparefunc(const struct dirent **dentry1,
+        * Therefore, we get the wrong sorted order like memory@10000000 and
+        * memory@f000000.
+        */
+-      if (strchr(str1, '@') && strchr(str2, '@') &&
+-              (strlen(str1) > strlen(str2)))
+-              return 1;
++      if (ptr1 && ptr2) {
++              len1 = ptr1 - str1;
++              len2 = ptr2 - str2;
++              if (!strncmp(str1, str2, len1 >len2 ? len1: len2) &&
++                                      (strlen(str1) > strlen(str2)))
++                              return 1;
++      }
+
+       return strcmp(str1, str2);
+ }
+--
+1.7.9.5
+

--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-commits



-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to