On 16 June 2014 16:10, Javier Viguera <[email protected]> wrote: > Attached the obvious cherry-pick of the commit from *master* with a basic > conflict solved. But I don't think this is acceptable in an already-released > stable branch "Daisy" as it involves a recipe rename (dbus-ptest_1.6.18.bb > => dbus-test_1.6.18.bb) that probably will break the projects of current > users of yocto Daisy. > > Instead, would a basic change like the following be enough?: > > > -RDEPENDS_dbus = "${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'ptest', > 'dbus-ptest-ptest', '', d)}" > +RDEPENDS_dbus = "${@base_contains('PTEST_ENABLED', '1', 'dbus-ptest-ptest', > '', d)}" > > This does not change any recipe name so it seems suitable for a bug-fix only > branch but unfortunately this goes beyond my skills in Yocto and ptest > framework so any advise would be appreciated.
That change doesn't solve your problem, so no. I'm not the daisy maintainer but I can see a good argument for merging the change even with the rename. Ross -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
