On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 02:25:34PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Incase we have overrides applied to IMAGE_FSTYPES we need to make sure >> > that we evaluate it fully before performing the live and vmdk logic >> > checks. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <[email protected]> >> >> Do you have an example how it used to fail? > > Sure: > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/images/build-appliance-image_8.0.bb > b/meta/recipes-core/images/build-appliance-image_8.0.bb > index 7b70025..23bb02e 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-core/images/build-appliance-image_8.0.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/images/build-appliance-image_8.0.bb > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ IMAGE_ROOTFS_EXTRA_SPACE = "41943040" > APPEND += "quiet" > > DEPENDS = "zip-native" > -IMAGE_FSTYPES = "vmdk" > +IMAGE_FSTYPES_x86-64 = "vmdk" > > inherit core-image > > And now you won't get vmdk images on qemux86-64 (same for live, did the > same proof-of-concept there when working up the patch).
Isn't it a bug in BitBake? I'd expect it to work fine. Richard, can you provide some feedback? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
