Richard,
On 07/15/2014 08:09 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 07:11 -0700, akuster wrote:
On 07/15/2014 06:49 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 15 July 2014 14:27, Armin Kuster <[email protected]> wrote:
Add GNUv3 license
If nettle 3 contains GPLv3 code then we probably don't want to remove
nettle 2.1, for people building without any v3 code in the images.
They have what they call dual license in 3.x ( GPLv2 or GPLv3). We
certainly can keep 2.7.1
Is it "GPLv2 or GPLv3" or "GPLv2 and GPLv3". There is a big difference
and the LICENSE field needs to be set correctly (&& or || in the license
field).
Looks like 'or':
<snippet>
GNU Nettle is free software: you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of either:
* the GNU Lesser General Public License as published by the Free
Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or (at your
option) any later version.
or
* the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your
option) any later version.
or both in parallel, as here.
- Armin
Cheers,
Richard
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
