On 16 July 2014 10:11, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm still a little concerned about this change from svn to git. Which is > the definitive source? It looks like the svn repo is active too? > > I just don't want to end up in a position where we're pulling from > someone's hack'n'dev version of lz4 rather than the place considered the > real "master" source...
The revision histories *are* different (commits marked "untested" and then fixed in another commit) but the owner of the git repo is the same as the owner of the svn repo. It looks like git is his working area and then changes that have been tested are merged and committed to git. Unless there's a good reason I'd keep with the svn repo for now. Ross -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
