On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 11:47:30 -0700 Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote:
> the patch is good but introducing another variable is not needed you > can cover it under US_LDCONFIG itself, ldconfig with empty ld.so.conf > will still parse standard lib search paths anyway The reason I wanted another variable is to control the creation of a *non-empty* ld.so.conf that would pick up other config files. The idea is that if you wanted to add a non-standard library search path, you could create a file in ld.so.conf.d. I didn't want to make the file have contents unconditionally. > Secondly when we use ldconfig it generates ld.so.cache under /etc > so I hope we take care of this when we have ro-rootfs I assume that's already working for the existing empty ld.so.conf you get with USE_LDCONFIG=1. It does occur to me that I don't know whether our cross-ldconfig knows this syntax. I'll double-check that. -s -- Listen, get this. Nobody with a good compiler needs to be justified. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
