On 14-08-28 16:03:51, Kang Kai wrote: > On 2014年08月28日 15:33, Khem Raj wrote: > >On 14-08-27 18:53:41, Kang Kai wrote: > >>Hi Saul, > >> > >>I am working on Bug 6487 - Add Aarch64 qemu target. I take tune and config > >>files from linaro then succeeds to build core-image-minimal and > >>core-image-sato. > >> > >>And I have 2 question about it now: > >>1 What should the new qemu aarch64 bsp looks like at the end? Do the files > >>in the patch attached are enough? And what more test should we do except to > >>build images such as core-image-sato, core-image-sato even build world? > >> > >may be eventually support linux-yocto, and linux-linaro both, it should > >be tested at same level as other QEMU BSPs > > > >>2 There 2 aarch64 configure files from linaro. First one is little endian > >>and it is as default, and the other one is big endian. I take the little > >>endian one as qemuarm64.conf as linaro does. Do we need add the other one as > >>qemuarm64_be.conf or something like that? > >Name them same as meta-linaro please, so eventually linaro layer can > >drop it and take up the maintenance of them in OE-Core > > Keep same name with linaro is convenient for merge work. But the name > 'genericarmv8' is not coordinated with existing qemu bsps. I prefer to use > qemuarmv8 for coordination.
Thats a valid point, I would give in. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
