On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Robert P. J. Day <[email protected]>
wrote:
> meta/recipes-core/uclibc/uclibc.inc:do_install_append_pn-uclibc () {
>
> now, given that the above file is clearly the general include file for
> the uclibc package, could the task append definition:
>
> do_install_append_pn-uclibc () {
>
> not have been written more simply as:
>
> do_install_append () {
>
> as in, given that this task append is clearly only for the uclibc
> package, it seems unnecessary to add a package-specific override. most
> other recipes use the second, shorter form, so i was wondering if
> there was something subtle about the uclibc recipe that necessitated
> the first form.
>
uclibc.inc is included by both uclibc-initial and uclibc.
--
Christopher Larson
clarson at kergoth dot com
Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
Maintainer - Tslib
Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
