On Wednesday 12 November 2014 11:16:38 Saul Wold wrote: > On 11/12/2014 10:50 AM, Alejandro Hernandez wrote: > > Removed: fix-a-Gcc-undefined-behavior.patch - Upstream > > > > Removed: 0001-statd-fixed-the-with-statdpath-flag.patch - Upstream > > > > Removed: fix-the-start-statd.patch - Different solution on upstream > > > > Removed: nfs-utils-1.0.6-uclibc.patch - Different solution on upstream > > > > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Hernandez <[email protected]> > > --- > > > > .../files/fix-a-Gcc-undefined-behavior.patch | 38 ------- > > .../0001-statd-fixed-the-with-statdpath-flag.patch | 41 -------- > > .../nfs-utils/nfs-utils/fix-the-start-statd.patch | 30 ------ > > .../nfs-utils/nfs-utils-1.0.6-uclibc.patch | 27 ----- > > .../nfs-utils/nfs-utils_1.3.0.bb | 115 > > --------------------- .../nfs-utils/nfs-utils_1.3.1.bb > > | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > Did you use git mv? or pass the -M to send-email since that correctly > do renames.
It would be -M when using send-email (or format-patch). git mv doesn't actually do anything different than a separate git add followed by git rm. FWIW, the scripts/create-pull-request & send-pull-request script already specify -M (among other things), so although a pull request isn't all that useful with a single patch, I tend to use it anyway. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
