On 14-12-19 09:12 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
As a "normal" recipe, mulitlib would try and extend it for multilibs.
By inheriting module-base, we can avoid this since we now look more
'kernel' like.

Also looks good. I didn't trigger the multilib issues here, but looking
at the arch settings in module-base .. I see it now.

Cheers,

Bruce


Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]>

diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/kernel-devsrc.bb 
b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/kernel-devsrc.bb
index facc235..2872f17 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/kernel-devsrc.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/kernel-devsrc.bb
@@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = 
"file://${COMMON_LICENSE_DIR}/GPL-2.0;md5=801f80980d171dd6425

  inherit linux-kernel-base

+# Whilst not a module, this ensures we don't get multilib extended (which 
would make no sense)
+inherit module-base
+
  # We need the kernel to be staged (unpacked, patched and configured) before
  # we can grab the source and make the kernel-devsrc package
  do_install[depends] += "virtual/kernel:do_populate_sysroot"



--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to