On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Otavio Salvador > <ota...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: >> When the sstate hash changes for do_configure task, the do_configure >> default implementation triggers the 'clean' to be run. For it to >> succeed we need to have KERNEL_SRC defined in EXTRA_OEMAKE. Fixes >> following error: > > I wanted to reproduce this locally, since I've never seen the problem > myself. > > What's the best way to trigger the sstate hash change ? > > I also have a question below ...
This was triggered when I did a change in the kernel-module-mcc; so when I changed the recipe it triggered the configure. >> ,---- >> | DEBUG: Executing shell function do_configure >> | NOTE: make -e MAKEFLAGS= clean >> | make -C M=.../tmp/work/... clean >> | make[1]: *** M=.../tmp/work/...: No such file or directory. Stop. >> | Makefile:20: recipe for target 'clean' failed >> | make: *** [clean] Error 2 >> | ERROR: oe_runmake failed >> `---- >> >> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br> >> --- >> meta/classes/module.bbclass | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/meta/classes/module.bbclass b/meta/classes/module.bbclass >> index ad6f7af..5cb8623 100644 >> --- a/meta/classes/module.bbclass >> +++ b/meta/classes/module.bbclass >> @@ -6,10 +6,11 @@ addtask make_scripts after do_patch before do_compile >> do_make_scripts[lockfiles] = "${TMPDIR}/kernel-scripts.lock" >> do_make_scripts[deptask] = "do_populate_sysroot" >> >> +EXTRA_OEMAKE += "KERNEL_SRC=${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR}" >> + > > I'm not seeing very well at the moment and my ability to browse the code > is restricted, so bear with a potentially stupid question. No worries. > It's clear from the error message above why this is needed, but I'm not > seeing the code that is respecting/using KERNEL_SRC to trigger the > clean in the right directory. Where exactly is this being used (I know your > related base.bbclass change will pull in the extra make args, but I'm just > not seeing the Makefile that respects it). > > Basically, I'm trying to decide if it would be better to handle this all in > the module class, and add a do_configure to the do_compile and > do_install we already have. > > Since I'm not seeing it, others might not as well .. and we can enhance the > comments to make it clear. It was triggered from the module Makefile. So it basically runned: make clean and it tried to load it from kernel source, which obviously failed. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core