On 1/27/15, 8:18 AM, "Richard Purdie" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 15:48 +0000, Hart, Darren wrote: >> On 1/27/15, 7:45 AM, "Bruce Ashfield" <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >> >On 15-01-27 10:29 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: >> >> We need the depmod data so that the kernel depmod command works >> >>successfully >> >> at rootfs time. The fact this was working inconsistently is now >> >>highlighted >> >> after the command was made to error out. A simple test case is: >> >> >> >> bitbake virtual/kernel image >> >> bitbake vrituak/kernel -c clean >> >> bitbake image -c rootfs -f >> >> >> >> We fix it by adding the missing dependency. >> > >> >Looks good here. >> > >> >Out of curiosity, was this hiding before, or did it only come about due >> >to our recent moves to the work-shared kernel builds ? >> >> I'm being dense I guess. I went to go verify what virtual/kernel >> do_populate_sysroot is doing in the current state of things, in order to >> be sure it copied over the right files, and I couldn't find it quickly. >> Where is this defined? > >http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=11ef55a93bd2bbd95e203 >fab3aa237322923ffd9 > >Specifically: > >sysroot_stage_all () { > sysroot_stage_dir ${D}${datadir}/kernel-depmod >${SYSROOT_DESTDIR}${datadir}/kernel-depmod >} Right, I thought of this while driving in :-) -ENOCOFFEE Reviewed-by: Darren Hart <[email protected]> -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
