* Bottazzini, Bruno <[email protected]> [150305 17:15]: > On Qui, 2015-03-05 at 15:28 +0100, Anders Darander wrote:
> > Just a quick question before I look into the patch in more detail. > > Is the new setting of PACKAGECONFIG consistent with how systemd was > > built previously? I guess it is. > Hi Anders, > it is consistent with how systemd was built previously. If you apply the > patch and bitbake it. Systemd will be built and shipped normally. > But now it will give some options on how to customize it by excluding > packages you don't want to be with systemd. Nice, I'm really liking this! That's something I've planned on doing myself for a while. > > Another comment, you should remove the dependcies that gets added using > > PACKAGECONFIG from DEPENDS, e.g. acl etc. (Or are they required > > nevertheless?) > You mean I should do the following ? > - PACKAGECONFIG[acl] = "--enable-acl,--disable-acl,acl" > + PACKAGECONFIG[acl] = "--enable-acl,--disable-acl" No, I meant to remove them from the long DEPENDS = "kmod docbook-sgml-dtd-4.1-native intltool-native gperf-native acl readline dbus libcap libcgroup glib-2.0 qemu-native util-linux" line. (Unless I overlooked that part in your patch?) > If I get what you said correctly, yes they are required. What I meant, was thas unless e.g. acl is required even when building with --disable-acl, it's better to add the acl dependency in the PACKAGECONFIG like you to. Though, at the same time, remove acl from the long DEPENDS-line. (As otherwise we'll build acl anyway). Cheers, Anders -- Anders Darander ChargeStorm AB / eStorm AB -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
