> On Mar 11, 2015, at 7:53 AM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, March 11, 2015, Richard Purdie > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 08:33 +0000, Khem Raj wrote: > > - Do not mount /var/volatile to be tmpfs always only when generating > > readonly rootfs > > - Generate var-volatile.mount unit when using system in readonly-rootfs > > to mount /var/volatile as tmpfs > > - for sysvinit, mount /var/volatile to be tmpfs if its not already > > mounted so > > - Use RequiresMountsFor instead of After=, so systemd figures out the > > needed dependencies for making /var/volatile accessible for journald > > and not us. > > > > Change-Id: I0b176b3e1c1e88e84d2c93154aac04cef565d8ea > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > > --- > > meta/classes/image.bbclass | 1 > > + > > meta/recipes-core/base-files/base-files/fstab | 1 > > - > > meta/recipes-core/initscripts/initscripts-1.0/read-only-rootfs-hook.sh | 2 > > +- > > meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/journald-volatile.conf | 2 > > +- > > 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Which combinations has this been tested with? Given the time the patch > has existed for, I'm sceptical all the combinations we need have been > tested, I'd love to be wrong. > > This is a pretty major change of behaviour and given the problems > previous changes have caused, I'm very very very nervous about what > issues this is going to cause :(. > > Systemd in both ways but not sysvinit
Just when you think all is well, I just sent a V2, that seemed to work on x86 emulator, but due diligence is better I don’t have sysvinit setups, its fine if it doesn’t go in, the fact that patch is out there folks can always back port after release. > > Cheers, > > Richard >
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
