On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 02:32:13PM +0000, Iorga, Cristian wrote:
> for 2.0 (why 1.10??), if that will be the name, all mechanisms for
> having BlueZ alternatives will be removed, and BlueZ 5 will be the
> only official supported BT stack.

why would you remove mechanisms for having BlueZ alternatives?

Some projects are still using different bluetooth implementations and
having the possibility to disable/replace bluez* is still useful.

Cheers,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Otavio 
> Salvador
> Sent: Monday, April 6, 2015 4:18 PM
> To: Peter A. Bigot
> Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 5/5] bluetooth.bbclass: set bluez5 as the 
> default BT stack
> 
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Peter A. Bigot <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 04/06/2015 02:31 AM, Iorga, Cristian wrote:
> >
> > I thought of 1.9 as the preparatory stage for complete removal of 
> > bluez4, so that in 2.0 it would be very easy to remove the support for 
> > bluez4.
> > Continuing to have bluez5 added to DISTRO_FEATURES create the 
> > impression that BlueZ5 is still a second class citizen compared to 
> > BlueZ4, and it is not my intention to sustain this opinion via code.
> >
> > I hereby standup for my solution. At the moment, we are 1to1. “We 
> > think” – Who are the others persons, Ross?
> >
> > /Cristian
> >
> >
> > While I fully support moving to bluez5 and use it in all my images, I 
> > do think it's a bit abrupt to make it the default in the first stable 
> > release that provides a usable bluez5.  On the other hand, Yocto's 
> > late to the
> > bluez5 party and it's going to be harder to support bluez4 now.
> >
> > Six of one; sign me up as weak support for delaying the move to 
> > default
> > bluez5 until 1.10.
> >
> > Just an opinion.
> 
> I prefer bluez5 default in 1.9 and removal in 2.0 (or 1.10). We shouldn't be 
> support legacy without a very strong reason and if any member shows up to 
> officially support bluez4 for longer we may drop its removal but bluez5 
> default should be done as soon as possible so we iron out regressions.
> 
> -- 
> Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
> http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: [email protected]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to