On 2015-04-28 12:38 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
This series cleans up the code in kernel.bbclass and
separates out the uImage generation. The 7th patch
in this series then adds support for generation of the
advanced successor of the uImage, the fitImage.
This series adds only very rudimentary support for
generation of fitImage. The advanced features might
be added in subsequent patches.
I read the series, and nothing fundamentally wrong jumps out.
Just one comment and one question from me.
Cheers,
Bruce
I would also like to thank Richard for explaining to
me how to properly do the implementation and I hope
this series is at least close to that.
Marek Vasut (8):
kernel: Clean up KERNEL_IMAGETYPE_FOR_MAKE
kernel: Rework do_uboot_mkimage
kernel: Pull out the linux.bin generation
kernel: Pull uImage generation into separate class
kernel: Separate out uboot_prep_kimage
kernel: Build DTBs early
kernel: Add basic fitImage support
kernel: Build uImage only when really needed
meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass | 234 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
meta/classes/kernel-uboot.bbclass | 21 +++
meta/classes/kernel-uimage.bbclass | 36 +++++
meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 46 ++-----
meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-dtb.inc | 14 +-
5 files changed, 318 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
create mode 100644 meta/classes/kernel-uboot.bbclass
create mode 100644 meta/classes/kernel-uimage.bbclass
Cc: Richard Purdie <[email protected]>
Cc: Koen Kooi <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Eggleton <[email protected]>
Cc: Ross Burton <[email protected]>
Cc: Bruce Ashfield <[email protected]>
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
