On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Armin Kuster <[email protected]> wrote: > | tset.o:(.debug_loc+0xe8): undefined reference to `.LCL0' > | tset.o:(.debug_loc+0xf7): undefined reference to `.LCL0' > > thanks Khem > > Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <[email protected]> > --- > meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb > b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb > index 03a24f0..22b111a 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb > @@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ inherit autotools gettext > > acpaths = "-I ${S}/db/dist/aclocal -I ${S}/db/dist/aclocal_java" > > +FULL_OPTIMIZATION_powerpc_remove = "-O2" > +FULL_OPTIMIZATION_append_powerpc = " -Os " > +
http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/commit/?h=kraj/master&id=741d3bf91144973d26de647039fa60b87a09edf1 fixes same issue for libx11 I am wondering if we should make this change in some common config metadata file to list all recipes that need this workaround untill gcc is fixed for it may be arch-powerpc.inc, since then it will be easy to remember to unbolt them once gcc is fixed. > # Specify the default rpm macros in terms of adjustable variables > rpm_macros = > "%{_usrlibrpm}/macros:%{_usrlibrpm}/poky/macros:%{_usrlibrpm}/poky/%{_target}/macros:%{_etcrpm}/macros.*:%{_etcrpm}/macros:%{_etcrpm}/%{_target}/macros:~/.oerpmmacros" > rpm_macros_class-native = > "%{_usrlibrpm}/macros:%{_usrlibrpm}/poky/macros:%{_usrlibrpm}/poky/%{_target}/macros:~/.oerpmmacros" > -- > 2.3.5 > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
