On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 03:25:43PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: >> On 11 May 2015 at 20:52, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dmitry_ere...@mentor.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Currently qemuarm is limited to 256 Mb of RAM. Sometimes this is too >> > little to run necessary applications. Add a new arm configuration based >> > on Versatile Express board, Cortex-A9 CPU, allowing up to 1Gb of RAM. >> > >> >> Not sure I'm keen on oe-core having two almost-identical qemuarm machines. >> Why not just change the qemuarm machine to use the A9? > > Then we should officially drop thumb1 support, because current qemuarm > builds are quite broken when thumb is enabled and dropping current > qemuarm or replacing it with A9 variant will prevent oe-core to be > testable on autobuilder. See > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7717
+1 for updating qemuarm to an ARMv7 CPU. As for dropping thumb1 support that's probably fine too - although technically (if someone really did want to keep thumb1 support alive) I guess nothing prevents testing thumb1 binaries on an ARMv7 CPU? > -- > Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
