On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 09:58 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > While diagnosing a problem with xf86-video-intel I noticed we had two > copies of drm headers in the sysroot; one from here and one from > the libdrm package. The xf86-video-intel turned out to be another > thing, but that doesn't mean we want two copies in the sysroot with > different content and luck of include path indicating which one we > get. > > This one landed in usr/include/drm and the libdrm one put its files > at usr/include/libdrm, so there was no obvious over-write conflict. > > The obvious risk here would be unearthing implicit dependencies on > the libdrm; things trying to build before it has populated the sysroot > but two full highly parallel builds containing a full desktop graphics > suite did not show any issues. > > Cc: Bruce Ashfield <[email protected]> > Cc: Richard Purdie <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
Is this something which should get addressed in the upstream kernel? I agree we likely don't want two sets of those. Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
