On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Philip Balister <phi...@balister.org> wrote:
> On 08/19/2015 10:21 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 17 August 2015 at 16:41, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There are many reasons, for me its overlay support for systemd-nspawn,
>>>> networkd has got many new features that is now usable w.r.t. IP forwarding,
>>>> vxlan etc.
>>>> and it has many bug fixed in those 2000 odd commits since 219, no
>>>> different then any other package upgrades we do in general it keep the
>>>> upgrade workload lower as we roll the releases.
>>>> Any specific concerns ?
>>>
>>>
>>> Can we get an updated patch with a clearer commit log?
>
> I've also heard that as systemd evolves, more binaries are getting added
> to the base package that should be packaged separately for people
> interested in small images. I do not have personal experience here, but
> wanted to pass along the feedback.
>
> We should look at buildhistory packaging differences when we do upgrades.

Here is the diff between files in 219 and 224, if you want to know
more I can paste more info just let me know.

https://gist.github.com/kraj/2a066973a5e5cf83ed24

sizes have gone up on daemons, no new daemons besides some new service files
and scripts are added
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to