* Set the nettle binary package license to LGPLv2.1+:
  There are GPL files in the sources but none of these are used
  to produce the files we ship.
* Remove the useless package specific licenses: none of the named
  packages are actually produced and the licenses do not affect
  the overall license of either the sources or the binary package.

Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen <[email protected]>
---
 meta/recipes-support/nettle/nettle_2.7.1.bb | 9 +--------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/nettle/nettle_2.7.1.bb 
b/meta/recipes-support/nettle/nettle_2.7.1.bb
index f9d331f..7823df9 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-support/nettle/nettle_2.7.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-support/nettle/nettle_2.7.1.bb
@@ -2,14 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "A low level cryptographic library"
 HOMEPAGE = "http://www.lysator.liu.se/~nisse/nettle/";
 SECTION = "libs"
 LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 & GPLv2"
-
-LICENSE_${PN}-cast = "CC0"
-LICENSE_${PN}-gosthash = "MIT"
-
-# both public and GPL license listed
-LICENSE_${PN}-md2 = "CC0 & LGPLv2.1+"
-LICENSE_${PN}-md4 = "CC0 & LGPLv2.1+"
-
+LICENSE_${PN} = "LGPLv2.1+"
 
 LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING.LIB;md5=2d5025d4aa3495befef8f17206a5b0a1 \
                     
file://serpent-decrypt.c;beginline=53;endline=67;md5=bcfd4745d53ca57f82907089898e390d
 \
-- 
2.1.4

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to