On Saturday 29 August 2015 00:54:10 Burton, Ross wrote: > On 29 August 2015 at 00:43, Ross Burton <[email protected]> wrote: > > Using connman-applet as a multilib test case seems quite heavy due to the > > numerous dependencies it has, whereas the same test ("do binaries get > > swapped > > correctly") can be done with a lower-level library containing binaries, > > for > > example glib-2.0. > > Updating the related bug made me realise that this would mean adding logic > to the autobuilder to handle new and old tests, so it really isn't worth it.
Why is that? Really the autobuilder should just be running all valid tests for the image and not have any knowledge of what tests are being run. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
