On 31 August 2015 at 17:38, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is alternative suggestion. I think all this is happening for > nettle which we have GPLv2 version in core. There doesnt seem to be a > full use of libgmp elsewhere. > nettle can be built using mini-gmp, as well I think that route should > be explored. That also keeps the us honest with our motive of moving > all gplv2 legacy packages to layer of its own in future.
Is it actually possible to build a working LGPL2 version of nettle with mini-gmp? I did look at that option (and the "--with-mini-nettle" option for gnutls) but couldn't figure it out. With our current nettle (2.7.1) the problems are A) it doesn't actually have a "--enable-mini-gmp" option: only one test binary seems use mini-gmp B) the gmp files that are included are actually LGPL3 (so even if we could use them, it would not help the end goal much) - Jussi
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
