Hi Richard, On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 21:39 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > Hi Armin, Joshua, > > I've just been looking at the patches queued for the dizzy/fido > branches. In fact I ended up merging them before I realised there are > some issues. > > The problem is there are dizzy patches which aren't in fido, which > breaks our policies. Could the two of you work to resolve that and > give > me fido branch to pull which resolved it please?
I just had a look at changes merged to dizzy in the past two weeks, assuming the issues were recent, and found the following changes in dizzy which I didn't have in fido: * Some QEMU CVE fixes, those don't apply to the newer QEMU in fido (2.2.0 vs. 2.1.0). * A fix for CVE-2015-5477 in bind, fido has a different patch to include this - probably not worth a revert & merge though? * Three lib/oeqa changes - I've cherry-picked them to my joshuagl/fido -next branch[1]. In future I'll keep an eye on changes tagged for dizzy too and try to help avoid this happening again. Regards, Joshua 1. http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=joshua gl/fido-next -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
