On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 15:08 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > On 7 September 2015 at 03:19, <[email protected]> wrote: > > + > Note on targets where the @ character is the start of a > comment > + > (eg ARM) then another character is used instead. For > example the > + > ARM port uses the % character. > > > > Is the documentation badly written or does this now broke the build on > x86?
Surely the ARM assembly code would never have worked on x86 anyway. It's a bit of a mystery how the original code ever worked for anyone on ARM, given that binutils has behaved this way for nearly 20 years, but this patch does seem like an improvement. I agree that the commit message leaves a little bit to be desired though. p.
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
