> On Sep 7, 2015, at 2:48 PM, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 14:15 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Sep 7, 2015, at 12:36 PM, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, 2015-09-06 at 15:25 +0000, Khem Raj wrote: >>>> update-rc.d is now needed by systemd to interact with sysv >>>> scripts, so if we have a mixed system, then we can not uninstall >>>> update-rc.d as it is going to break systemd functionality >>> >>> The description above implies that you will only uninstall update-rc.d >>> if systemd is present, but that doesn't seem to be what the patch does. >> >> I meant to not say its only for systemd. but that systemd now needs it. >> so update-rc.d is no longer forcefully removed from image depchain. > > Well, right. But wouldn't it be better only to leave it in there if > it's actually necessary, i.e. if you have systemd and you also have sysv > scripts and the rootfs isn't read-only? As it stands, your patch will > cause update-rc.d to be left around for people who aren't using systemd, > which seems like a retrograde step. >
makes sense. I can improvise on it and check for all constraints in a follow up. > p. > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
