On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Nicolas Dechesne <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: >>> why are you adding a patch sent to freedreno mailing list (so I would >>> assume against xf86-video-freedreno), in the xf86-video-omap recipe, >>> is that a typo? >> >> thats where it was sent to. since thats the same list omap driver is using >> as well. >> >> > > hmm. really? I can't find any info about that. how did you figure this out? > > Note: I saw your patch on the freedreno ML, and actually the patch > also exists on the -freedreno driver as well... probably that file was > just copy/pasted.. in any case, from your email sent to freedreno it's > not obvious at all that you are targeting -omap driver. so if you can > confirm that -omap patches need to be sent on the freedreno list, then > at least you might want to resend with [omap] in subject to avoid > confusion.. I will test/submit the same patch for -freedreno on my > side.
i talked to Rob, he merged the patch in both -omap and -freedreno. 2 for the price of 1.. nico -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
