On 09/10/2015 05:08 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On 09/10/2015 02:50 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > >>> Then we can formulate a policy on top of that: for example, if a patch >>> has been 'Pending' for 3 months, the person who added it gets a >>> reminder to update the status; if the patch has been 'Pending' for 6 >>> months and the patch person has been unresponsive, no more patches are >>> accepted from that person until he does the upstreaming of the ones he >>> already got into oe-core. Something like that. >> >> With so many maintainers on so many different layers/etc we would need >> some sort of billboard somewhere listing the names of people currently >> on the "naughty" list ;-) > > Yes, something similar to http://recipes.yoctoproject.org > > And the autobuilder could automatically reject or flag a patch that adds > custom 'Pending' patches, if the patch author is determined to be on the > 'naughty' list :-)
That might just alter peoples behavior and change them to use "Submitted" and still not do anything. It does not address the issue. Having the ability to report a patch's status does have some merit. What is done with it is a different story. - armin > > > Alex -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
