On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 17:45 +0000, Alejandro Hernandez wrote:
> gcc packages use a shared source directory, this causes an issue since
> the archiver will try to patch the same source several times (one for
> each gcc package), producing an error, the archiver class used stamp-base
> to check this, nonetheless our gcc packages no longer use stamp-base,
> they use gcc-shared instead, which is what broke this functionality
> this patch adds a check to see whether or not the source should be patched,
> avoiding patching the source when it shouldnt.

Surely the source archiver shouldn't be doing *anything* if SRC_URI is
empty?

We don't need 20 copies of the gcc source code.

Cheers,

Richard

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to