On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 04:59:47PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 16:28 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 02:47:13PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > I know Martin finds something like this useful for testing sstate > > > signatures, > > > this adds one to meta-selftest so we can use it from oe-selftest in the > > > sstate > > > tests there too. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]> > > > > > > diff --git a/meta-selftest/conf/machine/qemux86copy.conf > > > b/meta-selftest/conf/machine/qemux86copy.conf > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000..bcce2f5 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/meta-selftest/conf/machine/qemux86copy.conf > > > @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ > > > +require conf/machine/qemux86.conf > > > + > > > +MACHINEOVERRIDES .= ":qemux86" > > > > I wasn't changing MACHINEOVERRIDES (in case this would hide some > > possible sstate differences), > > I think this actually makes it more likely to highlight differences, but > either way, the tests I ran did highlight a raft of issues and it seems > to be good enough to find several problems. I've sent enough fixes to > make the new selftest pass. > > > instead I had to duplicate couple qemux86 > > overrides in linux-yocto, but this is still useful. > > > > I'll drop my version after testing with sstate-diff-machines.sh that > > both return the same results. > > Sounds good. > > FWIW you can run the new test with: > > oe-selftest --run-tests sstatetests.SStateTests.test_sstate_sametune_samesigs > > in case that isn't clear. It doesn't rely on building anything so is > comparatively fast.
same as ssstate-diff-machines.sh --analyze :) -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
