On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 08:45 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> I understand Khem is excitant to include more non-upstreamed patches >> into GCC but I would prefer to have it included and Java working fine >> than a local patch applied forever. :-( > > Maybe you'd like to file a bug against upstream GCC in that case. I > think Khem already suggested this to Jens but he said he had "no time" > to do that.
We don't require upstream bugzilla items for patches in all recipes so GCC should not be an exception. Sorry but I don't buy this argument and I think the patch is clear and short enough to go in. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
