On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Bystricky, Juro <[email protected]> wrote: > The patch works unmodified (and solves mingw build problems) for gcc 4.9. as > well, > providing gcc-4.9.inc is patched the same way as gcc-5.2.inc > > (However, this makes the Makefile.in patch status: > > Upstream-Status: Pending > > incorrect for case of gcc 4.9.)
why it it incorrect. is gcc 4.9 EOL ? > > > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.9.inc > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.9.inc > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ SRC_URI = "\ > file://0063-nativesdk-gcc-support.patch \ > file://0064-handle-target-sysroot-multilib.patch \ > file://0065-gcc-483-universal-initializer-no-warning.patch \ > + file://0042-cxxflags-for-build.patch \ > " > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf >> Of Mark Hatle >> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 8:30 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [OE-core] [PATCH] Fix GCC 5.2 "_FOR_BUILD" and related variables >> >> Without this patch, the wrong header fragments can be used to generate the >> nativesdk, cross-canadian, and other variations. Generally this works fine. >> However, when there is enough variation from the build machine to the >> target runtime it will break.. (Such as SDKMACHINE=i686-mingw32) >> >> The bugs can also how up on a Linux -> Linux build, but it's signficiantly >> more >> rare. It would require some set of options that make the host headers and >> flags incompatible with the target. (Such as various profiling >> options.) >> >> This has been tested with a set of meta-mingw patches that will be sent to >> the Yocto Project mailing list soon. >> >> Mark Hatle (1): >> gcc-5.2: Fix various _FOR_BUILD and related variables >> >> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-5.2.inc | 1 + >> .../gcc/gcc-5.2/0042-cxxflags-for-build.patch | 123 >> +++++++++++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 124 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-5.2/0042-cxxflags-for- >> build.patch >> >> -- >> 1.9.3 >> >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
