On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Mike Crowe <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday 06 November 2015 at 10:30:04 +0000, Mike Crowe wrote: >> It would be great to get to the point that EXTRA_OEMAKE is empty by default >> but I imagine that the experts are already aware of the difficulties with >> doing this which is why the current value has lasted so long. > > I had a go at this. Fewer recipes than I expected seem to be affected. > > With bitbake.conf containing EXTRA_OEMAKE = "", the following recipes > needed to be changed to explicitly set EXTRA_OEMAKE = "-e MAKEFLAGS=": > > meta/recipes-bsp/pciutils/pciutils_3.3.1.bb > meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl.inc > meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox.inc
Busybox doesn't need make -e if you have my busybox cleanup patches (posted to the list recently, but not merged to master or mut yet). > meta/recipes-devtools/perl/perl_5.22.0.bb > > for core-image-minimal to build successfully[1]. > > I tried core-image-sato but got stuck when apr-util-native wouldn't compile > for me[2], even with stock master. > > So, perhaps the situation isn't quite as bad as I feared and it might be > possible to change the default value of EXTRA_OEMAKE. > > Mike. > > [1] I suspect that perl isn't required by core-image-minimal. That list is > my complete set of changes from trying to get core-image-sato to build. > > [2] x86_64-linux-libtool: compile: unable to infer tagged configuration > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
