On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 16:44 +0000, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 17 November 2015 at 15:16, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote: > > Does the resulting directfb-csource binary actually work with that > change? My recollection is that ld.bfd will just silently permit > relocs that gold (correctly) refuses to allow. > > > Personally I don't use DirectFB (and am constantly surprised it's still a > thing) so at this point I'm not going to merge either of these patches until > someone can confirm that their fix *works on hardware* instead of just > fixing the build. > > > I think that's a reasonable position. In any case, the underlying issue is > a compiler bug and ought really to be fixed there rather than patching > directfb or any other package that just happens to fall over it. >
The directfb-csource binary linked with the bfd linker segfaults on startup, so it does indeed look like a compiler problem. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
