On 12/2/15 3:30 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> From: Robert Yang <[email protected]>
> 
> The following error can occur:
>   smart install libc6-2.22-r0.1@lib32_mips32r2octeon3 
> libc6-dbg-2.22-r0.1@lib32_mips32r2octeon3
> error: file /sbin/ldconfig conflicts between attempted installs of 
> libc6-2.22-r0.1.lib32_mips32r2octeon3 and libc6-2.22-r0.1.octeon3_n32
> error: file /sbin/.debug/ldconfig conflicts between attempted installs of 
> libc6-dbg-2.22-r0.1.lib32_mips32r2octeon3 and libc6-dbg-2.22-r0.1.octeon3_n32
> 
> This was because:
> transactions_color = 001 (ELF32) & 010 (ELF64) & 100 (ELF32 N32 MIPS64)
> FColor = Current file color (001) & transaction_color (111)
> oFcolor = Previous file color (100) & transaction_color (111)
> 
> There are two places where the conflict comparisons occur.  In both places
> the 'else' clause was too restrictive (opposite of the 'positive' clause).
> This caused the system to only permit a binary comparison - "new preferred" or
> "old preferred".  It did not permissing "neither preferred".  By removing the

Above should be written "It did not -permit- "neither preferred"."

Updated version available at:

git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib mgh/rpm-n32


> else comparison the system will now perform a 'last-in-wins' resolution when
> "neither is preferred".
> 
> Note, if _transaction_color is 3, MIPS64 N32 will be skipped (pretend as
> installed).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <[email protected]>
> ---
>  ...ction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch | 52 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb            |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 
> meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-lib-transaction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch
> 
> diff --git 
> a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-lib-transaction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch
>  
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-lib-transaction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ed5d8a7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ 
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-lib-transaction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> +From 67ec7531e6297200eaa97ef917d49b0a75876cb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Robert Yang <[email protected]>
> +Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 00:56:07 -0800
> +Subject: [PATCH] lib/transaction.c: fix file conflicts for MIPS64 N32
> +
> +The following error can occur:
> +  smart install libc6-2.22-r0.1@lib32_mips32r2octeon3 
> libc6-dbg-2.22-r0.1@lib32_mips32r2octeon3
> +error: file /sbin/ldconfig conflicts between attempted installs of 
> libc6-2.22-r0.1.lib32_mips32r2octeon3 and libc6-2.22-r0.1.octeon3_n32
> +error: file /sbin/.debug/ldconfig conflicts between attempted installs of 
> libc6-dbg-2.22-r0.1.lib32_mips32r2octeon3 and libc6-dbg-2.22-r0.1.octeon3_n32
> +
> +This was because:
> +transactions_color = 001 (ELF32) & 010 (ELF64) & 100 (ELF32 N32 MIPS64)
> +FColor = Current file color (001) & transaction_color (111)
> +oFcolor = Previous file color (100) & transaction_color (111)
> +
> +There are two places where the conflict comparisons occur.  In both places
> +the 'else' clause was too restrictive (opposite of the 'positive' clause).
> +This caused the system to only permit a binary comparison - "new preferred" 
> or
> +"old preferred".  It did not permissing "neither preferred".  By removing the
> +else comparison the system will now perform a 'last-in-wins' resolution when
> +"neither is preferred".
> +
> +Upstream-Status: Pending
> +
> +Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <[email protected]>
> +Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <[email protected]>
> +---
> + lib/transaction.c |    3 ++-
> + 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> +
> +Index: rpm-5.4.14/lib/transaction.c
> +===================================================================
> +--- rpm-5.4.14.orig/lib/transaction.c
> ++++ rpm-5.4.14/lib/transaction.c
> +@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static int handleInstInstalledFile(const
> +             fi->actions[fx] = FA_SKIPCOLOR;
> + #endif
> +             rConflicts = 0;
> +-        } else if (FColor & prefcolor) {
> ++        } else {
> + #ifdef      REFERENCE
> +             rpmfsSetAction(fs, fx, FA_CREATE);
> + #else
> +@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ assert(otherFi != NULL);
> +                     fi->actions[i] = FA_SKIPCOLOR;
> +                     rConflicts = 0;
> +                 } else
> +-                if (FColor == 0 && oFColor == 0) {
> ++                {
> +                     /* ... otherwise, do both, last in wins. */
> +                     otherFi->actions[otherFileNum] = FA_CREATE;
> +                     fi->actions[i] = FA_CREATE;
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb 
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb
> index e22d208..09baac0 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb
> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ SRC_URI = 
> "http://www.rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/rpm-5.4.14-0.20131024.src.rpm;e
>          file://configure.ac-check-for-both-gpg2-and-gpg.patch \
>          file://0001-define-EM_AARCH64.patch \
>          file://rpm-rpmfc.c-fix-for-N32-MIPS64.patch \
> +        file://rpm-lib-transaction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch 
> \
>         "
>  
>  # Uncomment the following line to enable platform score debugging
> 

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to