See: http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-November/112919.html
I think it fixes the same issue. On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Matt Madison <[email protected]> wrote: > I was trying some multilib ARM builds and ran into an issue. For > armv7ahf-neon-vfpv4, PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS is coded as > "armv7ahf-vfp-neon-vfpv4", > but the ARMPKGSFX_FPU suffix was getting constructed as "-vfp-vfpv4-neon", > resulting > in 32-bit packages not getting found due to the name mismatch. > > The following patch fixes this by changing ARMPKGSFX_FPU. I'm not sure if > it > would be more correct to change the PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS settings, but the > 'neon-vfpv4' more closely aligns to the tune names, so I took this route. > > Matt Madison (1): > feature-arm-neon.inc, feature-arm-vfp.inc: fix vfpv4 suffix ordering > > meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-neon.inc | 2 +- > meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-vfp.inc | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.5.0 > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
