Comments are old and specific to thumb1. Since oe-core CPU tuning files aren't really the right place to fully document ARM -vs- thumb, drop the comments instead of trying to update them.
Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <[email protected]> --- meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-thumb.inc | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-thumb.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-thumb.inc index 5632171..0a9545c 100644 --- a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-thumb.inc +++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-thumb.inc @@ -1,9 +1,3 @@ -# The instruction set the compiler should use when generating application -# code. The kernel is always compiled with arm code at present. arm code -# is the original 32 bit ARM instruction set, thumb code is the 16 bit -# encoded RISC sub-set. Thumb code is smaller (maybe 70% of the ARM size) -# but requires more instructions (140% for 70% smaller code) so may be -# slower. TUNEVALID[thumb] = "Use thumb instructions instead of ARM" ARM_THUMB_OPT = "${@['arm', 'thumb'][d.getVar('ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET', True) == 'thumb']}" ARM_THUMB_SUFFIX .= "${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'armv4', 't', '', d)}" -- 1.9.1 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
