> Am 09.12.2015 um 17:16 schrieb Dan McGregor <[email protected]>: > > On 8 December 2015 at 06:36, Otavio Salvador > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I would like to propose the backport of fe506ed (autotools: Allow >> recipe-individual configure scripts): >> >> commit fe506eddb0790e37ac1e50f37fa2e32ad81d5493 >> Author: Jens Rehsack <[email protected]> >> Date: Tue Oct 13 22:35:52 2015 +0200 >> >> autotools: Allow recipe-individual configure scripts >> >> OpenJDK-8 has it's configure script at common/autotools - which will cause >> the entire assumption of ${S}/configure is regenerated by >> autoreconf, intltoolize or alike >> fails heavily. >> >> Also - other configure mechanisms can be supported more similar >> (see how pkgsrc >> manages different ones ...) >> >> Signed-off-by: Jens Rehsack <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <[email protected]> >> >> This allows for a more controlled execution of the autotools scripts >> and as described on the commit log allows the use of OpenJDK-8 as >> well. > > I'd like to second this. Without it one needs the master branch to > build the new openjdk-8 recipes.
I currently use this on our jethro builds (those with the overlayfs ^^) without any issues. Build check might be easy, but we don't encounter any unexpected behavior on target. Cheers -- Jens Rehsack - [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
